Does discussion lead to opinion change within political science students? A pedagogical exercise of deliberative democracy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.111.2019Keywords:
Deliberative Democracy, Deliberation, Opinion Change, DiscussionAbstract
While the model of deliberative democracy gives a crucial role to dialogue, empirical evidence has not yet established if discussion helps to reach a better understanding of political issues and, above all, if individuals are prepared to change their views and preferences. Moreover, it is still unclear when the deliberative model, and more specifically discussion, could be usefully employed as a teaching tool, to improve students’ knowledge. This article presents an exercise carried out within the Department of Political and Social Sciences at the LUISS University of Rome. Students were asked to discuss in the classroom the course issues, and to cast a vote on selected issues before and after the deliberation. Although our sample is not representative, we have managed to gather evidence from the same population on a rather large number of issues. Students changed their view in 25.8 per cent of cases, and they agreed that discussion increased their understanding, while students with strong ex-ante views are more reluctant to change their opinions as a consequence of discussion. The experiment also shows the presence of impermeable and permeable subjects, the former which are more refractory to the discussion in changing their opinion, while the latter are more likely to change their preferences following deliberation.References
Ackerman, B., & Fishkin, J.S. (2002). Deliberation day. Journal of Political Philosophy, 10(2), 129-152.
Barabas, J. (2004). How deliberation affects policy opinions. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 687-701.
Bohm, R. M., & Vogel, R. E. (1994). A comparison of factors associated with uninformed and informed death penalty opinions. Journal of Criminal Justice, 22(2), 125-143.
Bosetti, G. & Maffettone, S. (Eds.). (2004). Democrazia deliberativa: cosa è. Rome: Luiss University Press.
Brookfield, S.D., & Preskill, S. (1999). Discussion as a way of teaching. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cochran, J.K., & Chamlin, M.B. (2005). Can information change public opinion? Another test of the Marshall hypotheses. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33(6), 573-584.
Cole, H.J. (2013). Teaching, practicing, and performing deliberative democracy in the classroom. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(2), Article 10, Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss2/art10.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: Macmillan.
Drury, S.A., Andre, D., Goddard, S., & Wentzel, J. (2016). Assessing deliberative pedagogy: Using a learning outcomes rubric to assess tradeoffs and tensions. Journal of Public Deliberation, 12(1), Article 5. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol12/iss1/art5.
Dryzek, J.S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin J. S. (2011). When the people speak: Deliberative democracy and public consultation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Haas, P., Hird, J.A., & McBratney, B. (Eds.) (2013). Controversies in Globalization. Los Angeles: Sage.
Hansen, K.M., & Andersen, V.N. (2004). Deliberative democracy and the deliberative poll on the Euro. Scandinavian political studies, 27(3), 261-286.
Hess, D.E. (2009). Controversy in the classroom: The democratic power of discussion. New York: Routledge.
Himmelroos, S., & Christensen, H.S. (2014). Deliberation and opinion change: Evidence from a deliberative mini public in Finland. Scandinavian Political Studies, 37(1), 41-60.
Isernia, P., Bobbio, L., Fiket, I., Manca, A.R., & Podestà , N. (2008). La democrazia in un ambiente ostile: un quasi-esperimento deliberativo. Stato e mercato, 17(3), 443-474.
Latimer, C., & Hempson, K.M. (2012). Using deliberation in the classroom: A teaching pedagogy to enhance student knowledge, opinion formation, and civic engagement. Journal of Political Science Education, 8(4), 372-388.
Longo, N.V. (2013). Deliberative pedagogy in the community: Connecting deliberative dialogue, community engagement, and democratic education. Journal of Public Deliberation, 9(2), Article 16. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss2/art16.
Luskin, R.C., Fishkin, J.S., & Jowell, R. (2002). Considered opinions: Deliberative polling in Britain. British Journal of Political Science, 32(3), 455-487.
Martin, P.W. (2003). “Key aspects of teaching and learning in arts, humanities and social sciencesâ€. In A handbook for teaching and learning in higher education, H. Fry, S. Ketteridge and S. Marshall (Eds.), pp. 301-323. London: Kogan Page.
Pomatto, G. (2013). Opinion change, meta-consensus and problem solving: The desirable outcomes of deliberation. Paper presented to the European Consortium on Political Research General Conference, Bordeaux.
Schkade, D., Sunstein, C.R., & Hastie, R. (2010). When deliberation produces extremism. Critical Review, 22(2-3), 227-252.
Sunstein, C.R. (2002). The law of group polarization. Journal of political philosophy, 10(2), 175-195.
Sunstein, C.R. (2009). Going to extremes: How like minds unite and divide. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Tormey, R., & Henchy, D. (2008). Re-imagining the traditional lecture: An action research approach to teaching student teachers to ‘do’philosophy. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(3), 303-314.
Wright, H.O., Bohm, R.M., & Jamieson, K.M. (1995). A comparison of uninformed and informed death penalty opinions: A replication and expansion. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 20(1), 57-87.
Young, I.M. (2002). Inclusion and democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
 | This licence lets others distribute, remix and build upon a work, even commercially, as long as they credit the original creator/s (and any other nominated parties). This is the most accommodating of the licences in terms of what others can do with the work. |
