Should European Countries refuse entrance to migrants that do not speak their language? A case for the right to family life

Authors

  • Daniele Santoro CNR-IRPPS, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Via Palestro, 32 - 00185 Rome,
  • Silvia Cavasola LUISS University, Viale Romania 32, 00197, Rome, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.102.2017

Keywords:

Third-country nationals (TCNs), Family-reunification, ECJ, State sovereignty, Civic integration test

Abstract

This article analyses the recent case of an ECJ ruling concerning Member States’ possibility to require third county nationals (TCNs) to pass a civic integration examination prior to family reunification. Following a description of the content of the right to family life for non-EU citizens residing in the EU, the article discusses the controversies surrounding the ECJ’s ruling, as well as the ethical and policy implication of the decision. The article argues that, while the Court’s decision is in line with the European Directive on Family Reunification, it does not take full consideration of the consequences of the Dutch policy regarding civic integration tests. In particular, the Court overlooks the fact that, while the test is hardly functional to state the capacity of integration, it acts as a form of ex-ante discrimination that contravenes Article 7 of the European Convention and Article 8 of the European Charter on the right to family life.

Author Biographies

Daniele Santoro, CNR-IRPPS, National Research Council, Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies, Via Palestro, 32 - 00185 Rome,

Research Fellow CNR- IRPPS

Silvia Cavasola, LUISS University, Viale Romania 32, 00197, Rome, Italy

Postdoctoral researcher, Political Science Department, LUISS University, Rome

References

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, (2000/C 364/01). Web 10 January 2015 http://www.europarl.europa.eu/charter/pdf/text_en.pdf .

COM 2008/610. Web 10 January 2015 http://eurlex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2008:0610:FIN:EN:PDF .

COM 2011/735. Web 10 January 2015 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0735:FIN:en:PDF .

European Council, Presidency Conclusions, Tampere, 15-16 October 1999. Web 10 January 2015 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/00200-r1.en9.htm

European Council, Presidency Conclusions, Laeken, 14-15 December 2001. Web 10 January 2015 http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/68827.pdf .

European Commission, Directive 2003/86/EC. Web 10 January 2015 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2003:251:0012:0018:en:PDF

European Commission, Directive 2003/109/EC. Web 10 January 2015 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32003L0109&from=en .

European Commission, Directive 2009/50/EC. Web 10 January 2015 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32009L0050&from=EN .

Council of Europe, European Convention on Human Rights, 1950. Web 10 January 2015 http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf .

European Court of Justice, Judgment (Second Chamber) of 9 July 2015, Minister van Buitenlandse Zaken v K and A (Case C-153/14). Web 10 January 2015 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:62014CJ0153

Jean Jaques Rousseau (1975), “Discourse of the Origin and Foundations of Inequality Among Men or Secound Discourseâ€, The Discourses and other early political writings, ed. Victor Gourevitch (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1997), 111-222.

Migration Policy Group, “Impact of new family reunion tests and requirements on the integration processâ€, MPG briefings for Green Paper on Family Reunion #3, 2011. http://www.migpolgroup.org/public/docs/Impact_of_new_family_reunion_tests_and_requirements_on_the_integration_process_MPG_Briefing_3.pdf .

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version), Official Journal (C 83), 30 March 2010. Web 10 January 2015 http://eur-lex.europa.eu/JOHtml.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:083:SOM:EN:HTML .

Published

2017-10-25

How to Cite

Santoro, D., & Cavasola, S. (2017). Should European Countries refuse entrance to migrants that do not speak their language? A case for the right to family life. IRPPS Working Papers, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.102.2017

Issue

Section

Working Papers