Analisi comparativa di due casi di studi di progetti di ricerca sugli Organismi Geneticamente Modificati in Italia e Inghilterra
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.45.2012Parole chiave:
Analisi di situazioni, Public understanding of science, Organismi geneticamente modificati, Analisi comparativaAbstract
Questo articolo esplora due casi di studio di progetti di ricerca, Farm Scale evaluation e OGM in Agricoltura, sugli Organismi Genticamente Modificati, e si domanda quali fattori politici, sociali ed economici hanno contribuito a costruire le risposte della scienza alla resistenza del pubblico verso gli OGM. I dati che vengono utilizzati includono, articoli di giornale, documenti governativi, articoli accademici, siti web e interviste con giornalisti e ricercatori che hanno partecipato direttamente o indirettamente a questi progetti. Paragonando questi progetti emergono sei fattori dominanti che sembrano maggiormente influire sulla capacità degli scienziati di ascoltare il pubblico. Questi includono: il governo, la posizione della scienza nel contesto culturale italiano, le aziende private, i tipi di pubblico, il ruolo dei mass media nella comunicazione scientifica, e la natura del dibattito relativo al Public Understanding of Science. In conclusione, come suggerisce Brian Wynne (2006), i discorsi relativi alla comunicazione della scienza si collocano in stretta relazione alla cultura locale relativa alla comunicazione e politica della scienza.Riferimenti bibliografici
Nature Biotechnology Editorial (2007). "Another inconvenient truth In Europe, no one apparently wants to listen if you have good news about genetically modified organisms (GMOs)." Nature Biotechnology 25(12): 1330.
AEBC, (2001). "Crops on trial. A report by the AEBC. " London, UK.
Bogani, P. (2006). "Instabilità genica e determinazione del rischio". Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RISULTATI. Roma: March 6th.
Burawoy, M. (2000). "Introduction". Global Ethnography: Forces, Connections, and Imagination in a Postmodern World. Michael Burawoy et al. Berkeley University of California Press: 1-40.
Burchell et al (2009). SCOPE Scientists on public engagement from communication to deliberation. BIOS Centre, London School of Economics.
Callon, M. et al (2009). Acting in uncertain worlds: An essay on technical democracy. MIT press.
Clarke, A. and C. Friese. (2007). Grounded Theorizing Using Situational Analysis. The Sage Handbook of Grounded Theory. Bryant, A. and K. Charmaz (Eds). London: Sage. 363-397.
Clarke, A. (2005). Situational analysis: grounded theory after the postmodern turn. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Clarke, A. (2003). "Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory Mapping After the Postmodern Turn." Symbolic Interaction 26(4): 553-576.
Cook, G. (2004). Genetically modified language: the discourse of arguments for GM crops and food. Routledge.
Cook, G. et al. (2004). "The scientists think and the public feels’: experts perceptions of the discourse of GM food". Discourse and society 15(3) 433-449.
Corbellini, G. (2009). Perche’ gli scienziati non sono pericolosi.
Corbellini, G. (2007). "Oscurantismo anti-OGM ". Il Sole 24 Ore: July 8th: 23.
DEFRA, (2000). "GM Crop Farm-Scale Evaluations: Background Papers. The History of the Farm-Scale Evaluations." Paper by the DETR Biotechnology Safety Group and the Scottish Executive: London.
DEFRA, (2001). "GM Crop Farm-Scale Evaluations: Background Papers. The Farm-Scale Evaluations of Genetically Modified Herbicide Tolerant Crops Rationale and Chronology." A Paper by the Biotechnology Safety Unit, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions. London, UK.
Diamand, E (2003). "Science as a smokescreen? A report on the farm scale evaluations of GM herbicide tolerant crops." Friends of the Earth, England, Wales and Northern Ireland.
EAC, (2004). "GM Foods—Evaluating the Farm Scale Trials." House of Commons. London, UK.
Ellis, R. et al. (2009). "Taxonomy, biodiversity and their publics in twenty-first-century DNA barcoding." Public Understanding of Science (Online First).
Firbank, L et al (2003). "An introduction to the Farm-Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops." Journal of Applied Ecology 40: 2-16.
Firbank, L et al (2002-November). "Farm Scale Evaluation of GM crops: effects of the management of the field scale release of genetically modified-herbicide-tolerant crops in the abundance and diversity of farmland wildlife."
Firbank, L et al (2002- March). "Farm Scale Evaluation of GM crops: effects of the management of the field scale release of genetically modified-herbicide-tolerant crops in the abundance and diversity of farmland wildlife."
Firbank, L et al (2001- October). "Farm Scale Evaluation of GM crops: effects of the management of the field scale release of genetically modified-herbicide-tolerant crops in the abundance and diversity of farmland wildlife."
Firbank, L et al (2001- January). "Farm Scale Evaluation of GM crops: effects of the management of the field scale release of genetically modified-herbicide-tolerant crops in the abundance and diversity of farmland wildlife."
Flick, U. (2006). An introduction to qualitative research. London; Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage Publications.
Franklin, S. (1995). "Science as Culture, Cultures of Science Author(s): Sarah Franklin Source." Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 163-184.
Friese, C. (2007). Enacting Conservation and Biomedicine: Cloning Animals of Endangered Species in the Borderlands of the United States. University of California, San Francisco.
Gamson, W. and A. Modigliani. (1989). "Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: a constructionist approach." The American Journal of Sociology 95:1-37.
Gutteling, J. M. (2005). "Mazur’s Hypothesis on Technology controversy and Media." International Journal of Public Opinion Research 17(1): 23-41.
Gutteling, J. M. et al. (2002). "Media coverage 1973-1996: Trends and dynamics. Biotechnology." The Making of a Global Controversy. M. W. Bauer and G. Gaskell, Eds 95-128.
Haves, C et al. (2003). "Responses of plants and invertebrate trophic groups to contrasting herbicide regimes in the Farm Scale Evaluations of genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops." Philosophical Translation. Royal Society London. 358: 1899–1913.
INRAN, (2007). "Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RIASSUNTO." Roma: March 6th.
INRAN, (2004). "RICERCHE SUGLI OGM IN AGRICOLTURA LAVORI IN CORSO" Sottoprogetto Centro di Documentazione OGM INRAN, October 5th.
Jasanoff, S. (2005). Design Nature. Princeton University Press.
Leach, M. et al. (2005). Science and citizens: globalization and the challenges of engagement. Zed Books.
Maiani, G. et al (2006) "Aspetti nutrizionali ed immunitari." Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RISULTATI. Roma: March 6th.
Mazur, A. (1981). "Media coverage and public opinion on scientific controversies." Journal of Communication 31(2): 106–115.
Mocali,S. and G. Pietramellara (2006). "Suolo e OGM." Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RISULTATI. Roma, March 6th.
Monastra, G. (2008). "An inconvenient version of events." Nature Biotechnology 26(4): 379.
Monastra, G. (2007). "OGM in Agricoltura: Rapporto al parlamento." INRAN: Roma.
Palozza, P. et al. (2006). "Linee cellulari intestinali per lo studio dell’attività dei carotenoidi nel pomodoro transgenico tlcy-b e nel suo controllo isogenico." Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RISULTATI. Roma, March 6th.
Reardon, J. (2007) "Democratic Mis-haps: The Problem of Democratization in a Time of Biopolitics." BioSocieties 2: 239–256.
Reardon, J. (2006) "Creating Participatory Subjects: Race, Science and Democracy in a Genomic Age." In Scott Frickel and Kelly Moore (Eds.), The New Political Sociology of Science: Institutions, Networks, and Power. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press 351-377.
Saba, A. (2006) "La percezione del consumatore straniero: alcuni risultati preliminary." Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RISULTATI. Roma: March 6th.
Veri, S. (2006). "Impatto economico degli OGM sul sistema agroalimentare italiano". Ricerche sugli OGM in Agricoltura: RISULTATI. Roma, March 6th.
Wynne, B. (2006). "Public Engagement as a Means of Restoring Public Trust in Science - Hitting the Notes, but Missing the Music?" Community Genetics 9 (3): 211-220.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
 | Questa licenza permette a terzi di riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire, recitare e modificare quest'opera, purché vengano citati l'autore e la fonte. Questa è la più ampia tra le licenze Creative Commons, rispetto alle libertà concesse a terzi sulle opere licenziate sotto attribuzione. |
