Il “diritto all’oblioâ€: affermare il controllo sulla nostra identità digitale o riscrivere la storia?
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.83.2016Parole chiave:
“Diritto all’oblioâ€, Diritto alla privacy, Libertà di espressione, Direttiva sulla Protezione dei Dati (95/46/EC)Abstract
La drammatica espansione di Internet negli ultimi venti anni ha presentato alla società nuovi dilemmi per quanto riguarda l’equilibrio dei diritti fondamentali non assoluti, in particolare il conflitto tra il diritto alla libertà di espressione da un lato, e il diritto alla privacy e alla protezione dei dati dall’altro. In tale contesto, l’articolo analizza il caso di Google Spagna, riguardante la richiesta di un cittadino spagnolo, al motore de ricerca, di sopprimere dei link rimandanti ad alcune informazioni personali. A seguito di una descrizione del caso, saranno esplorate le implicazioni e le polemiche che circondano la sentenza della CGUE sul “diritto all’oblioâ€. L’articolo conclude che, nonostante le molte incertezze emerse dalla decisione della CGUE, il caso ha riacceso un dibattito importante per quanto riguarda il rapporto degli individui con Internet, una discussione che non è stata limitata all’arena legale ma che ha permeato la società civile in generale.Riferimenti bibliografici
Advisory Council to Google (2015). Report of the Advisory Council to Google on the Right to be Forgotten, 6 February 2015. Web. 6 July 2015. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1UgZshetMd4cEI3SjlvV0hNbDA/view.
Ball, James (2015). “EU’s ‘right to be forgotten’: Guardian articles have been hidden by Googleâ€, The Guardian. 2 July 2014. Web 4 March 2015, http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/02/eu-right-to-be-forgotten-guardian-google.
Ball, James (2015). “Google admits to errors over Guardian ‘right to be forgotten’ link deletionsâ€, The Guardian, 10 July 2014. Web 14 March 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2014/jul/10/google-admits-errors-guardian-right-to-be-forgotten-deletions.
Big Brother Watch (2015). “The CJEU ruling does not provide “the right to be forgottenâ€â€, 14 May 2014. Web 3 March 2015. http://www.bigbrotherwatch.org.uk/2014/05/CJEU-rulingprovide-right-forgotten.
Council of the European Union (2015). Note on Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council, (COD) 9565/15, 11 June 2015. Web 6 July 2015. http://data.consilium.europa.eu/doc/document/ST-9565-2015-INIT/en/pdf.
Curtis, Sophie, Philipson, Alice (2015). “Wikipedia founder: EU’s ‘right to be forgotten’ is ‘deeply immoral’â€, The Telegraph. 6 August 2014. Web 4 March 2015, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/wikipedia/11015901/EU-ruling-on-link-removal-deeply-immoral-says-Wikipedia-founder.html.
European Commission, “Press Release: The EU Data Protection Reform 2012: Making Europe the Standard Setter for Modern Data Protection Rules in the Digital Ageâ€. 22 January 2012. Web 3 March 2015. Available http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_SPEECH-12-26_en.htm.
European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, Handbook on European Data Protection law. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union, 2014. Web. 3 March 2015. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Handbook_data_protection_ENG.pdf.
Frantziou, Eleni (2014). “Further Developments in the ‘right to be forgotten’: The European Court of Justice’s Judgment in Case C-131/12â€, Google Spain, SL, Google Inc v Agencia Española de Protección de Datos, Human Rights Law Review, pp. 1-17.
House of Lords, European Committee, EU Data Protection law: a ‘right to be forgotten’? London: Authority of the House of Lords, 2014. Web. 6 July 2015. http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldeucom/40/40.pdf.
Mayer-Schönberger, Viktor (2009). Delete: The Virtue of Forgetting in the Digital Age, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Mifsud Bonnici, Jeanne (2014). “Exploring the non-absolute nature of the right to data protectionâ€, International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 131-143.
Orwell, George (1949), 1984, Penguin, London.
Powles, Julia (2015). “Google says it acknowledges some people want ‘right to be forgotten’â€, The Guardian. 19 February 2015. Web 15 March 2015. http://www.theguardian.com/technology/2015/feb/19/google-acknowledges-some-people-want-right-to-be-forgotten.
Powles, Julia (2015). “Results May Varyâ€, Slate. 25 February 2015. Web 15 March 2015. 18
Rosen, Jeffrey (2012). “Symposium Issue: The ‘right to be forgotten’â€, Stanford Online Review, vol. 64, no. 88, pp. 88-92.
Sparkes, Mathew (2015). “Google removes more links under ‘right to be forgotten’â€, The Telegraph. 15 August 2014. Web 15 March 2015. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/google/11038155/Google-removes-more-links-under-right-to-be-forgotten.html.
Solove, Daniel J. (2015). “I’ve Got Nothing to Hide†and Other Misunderstandings of Privacyâ€, San Diego Law Review 44, pp. 745-772.
Toobin, Jeffrey (2015). “The Solace of Oblivionâ€, The New Yorker. 29 September 2014.Web 3 March 2015. http://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2014/09/29/solace-oblivion.
Warren, Samuel D., Brandeis, Louis D. (1980). The Right to Privacy, 4 Harvard Law Review 193 (1890).
The Economist (2015). “On being forgottenâ€, 17 May 2014. Web 15 March 2015. http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21602219-right-be-forgotten-sounds-attractive-it-creates-more-problems-it-solves-being
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
Questa licenza permette a terzi di riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire, recitare e modificare quest'opera, purché vengano citati l'autore e la fonte. Questa è la più ampia tra le licenze Creative Commons, rispetto alle libertà concesse a terzi sulle opere licenziate sotto attribuzione. |