Analisi esplorativa delle tendenze dei brevetti nei domini tecnologici di ‘ingegneria elettrica’ e di ‘chimica’ in Brasile: lezioni per i paesi in via di sviluppo
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.99.2017Parole chiave:
Proprietà intellettuale, Imprese transnazionali, BrasileAbstract
Questo articolo presenta i dati sulla pratica di brevettazione in Brasile e contribuisce alla comprensione di alcune caratteristiche del sistema nazionale di innovazione brasiliana, che altri paesi con lo stesso livello di sviluppo industriale potrebbero condividere con esso. In particolare, l’articolo mette in luce come in Brasile vi sia una quota dominante di brevetti nelle mani di soggetti non residenti, essendo per la maggior parte imprese transnazionali, provenienti dagli Stati Uniti, dall’Europa occidentale e dal Giappone. L’articolo, inoltre, dimostra che le strategie delle aziende indigene non sono tradotte in brevetti e che le aziende indigene, acquistate da parte delle imprese transnazionali, hanno ridotto le loro attività di brevettazione. Questo articolo si concentra su due domini tecnologici: ‘ingegneria elettrica’ – componenti elettrici, audiovisivi, telecomunicazioni, tecnologia dell’informazione e semiconduttori – e ‘chimica’ – prodotti chimici organici sottili, chimica macromolecolare, prodotti farmaceutici e cosmetici, e biotecnologiche – utilizzando i dati di PATSTAT.Riferimenti bibliografici
Akyuz, Yilmaz (2005). “Impasses do desenvolvimentoâ€. Novos Estudos CEBRAP no. 72:41-58.
Albuquerque Motta, Eduardo (1999). “National systems of innovation and non-OCED countries: notes about a rudimentary and tentative ‘tipology’â€. Revista de Economia PolÃtica no. 19 (4):35-52.
Albuquerque Motta, Eduardo (2000). “Domestic patents and developing countries: arguments for their study and data from Brazil (1980–1995)â€. Research Policy no. 29 (9):1047-1060.
Archibugi, Daniele, Filippetti, Andrea (2010). “The Globalisation of Intellectual Property Rights: Four Learned Lessons and Four Thesesâ€. Global Policy no. 1 (2).
Archibugi, Daniele, Filippetti, Andrea (2015). “Editors’ Introduction: Science, Technology, and Innovation go globalâ€. In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Archibugi, Daniele, Pietrobelli, Carlo (2003). “The globalisation of technology and its implications for developing countries Windows of opportunity or further burden?†Technological Forecasting & Social Change no. 70.
Caliari, Thiago, Mazzoleni, Roberto, Martins Costa Póvoa, Luciano (2013). “Innovation in the pharmaceutical industry in Brazil post-TRIPSâ€. In TRIPS compliance, National Patente Regimes and Innovation. Evidences and Experiences from Developing Countries, edited by Sunil Mani and Richard R. Nelson, 16-56. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
Caliari, Thiago, Machado Ruiz, Ricardo (2013). “Brazilian pharmaceutical industry and generic drugs policy: impacts on structure and innovation and recent developmentsâ€. Science & Public Policy:1-12.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2003). “Trade and Industrial Policy Issuesâ€. In Rethinking Development Economics, edited by Ha-Joon Chang, 257-276. London: Anthem Press.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2004). Chutando a escada: a estratégia do desenvolvimento em perspectiva histórica. São Paulo: Editora da UNESP.
Chang, Ha-Joon (2009). Maus samaritanos: o mito do livre-comércio e a história secreta do capitalismo. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.
Chesnais, François (2010). “National systems of innovation, foreign direct investment and operations of multinational enterprisesâ€. In National Systems of Innovation: Toward a theory of innovation and interactive learning, edited by Bengt Ã…ke Lundvall, 259-292. New York: Anthem Press.
Chiarini, Tulio, Siqueira Rapini, Marcia, Alves Silva, Leandro (2016). “Access to knowledge and catch-up: Exploring some IPRs data from Brazil and South Koreaâ€. Science & Public Policy:1-16. doi: 10.1093/scipol/scw034
Chiarini, Tulio, Gonçalves Silva, Ana Lucia (2016). “Intellectual property rights and innovation system: Some lessons from Brazilâ€. International Journal of Innovation and Learning no. 20 (3):265-288.
Conceição, Pedro, Gibson, David V., Heitor, Manuel V., Sirilli, Giorgio (2001). “Knowledge for Inclusive Development: The Challenge of Globally Integrated Learning and Implications for Science and Technology Policyâ€. Technological Forecasting & Social Change no. 66 (1):1-29.
Filippetti, Andrea, Archibugi, Daniele (2015). “The globalization of intellectual property rightsâ€. In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti, 421-442. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Furtado, André, Quadros Carvalho, Ruy (2005). “Patterns of technological intensity in Brazilian industry: a comparative study with developed countriesâ€. Innovation: Management, policy & practice no. 7 (2-3):152-171.
Gielfi, Giovanna G., Furtado, André, Tijssen, Robert J. W. (2016). R&D funding policy and university-industry research collaboration: the case of Petrobras. In 14th International Globelics Conference. Bandung (Indonesia).
Helpman, Elhanan (1992). Innovation, Imitation, and Intellectual Property Rights. In Working paper 4081. Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research.
Ietto-Gillies, Grazia (2012). Transnational Corporations and International Production. Concepts, theories and effects. Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Ietto-Gillies, Grazia (2015). “Innovation, internationalization, and the transnational corporationâ€. In The Handbook of Global Science, Technology, and Innovation, edited by Daniele Archibugi and Andrea Filippetti, 127-143. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
Kim, Yee Kyoung, Lee, Keun, Park, Walter G., Chood, Kineung (2012). “Appropriate intellectual property protection and economic growth in countries at different levels of developmentâ€. Research Policy no. 41 (2):358-375.
Lai, Edwin L.-C. (1998). “International Intellectual Property Rights Protection and Rate of Product Innovationâ€. Journal of Development Economics no. 55:133-153.
Lai, Edwin L.-C. (2007). “The Theory of International Policy Coordination in the Protection of Ideasâ€. In Intellectual Property, Growth and Trade (Frontiers of Economics and Globalization, Volume 2), edited by Keith E. Maskus. Hungary: Elsevier.
Lall, Sanjaya (2003). “Indicators of the relative importance of IPRs in developing countriesâ€. Research Policy no. 32:1657-1680.
Mansfield, Edwin, Schwartz, Mark, Wagner, Samuel (1981). “Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Studyâ€. The Economic Journal no. 91 (364):907-918.
Mazzoleni, Roberto, Nelson, Richard R. (1998a). “The benefits and costs of strong patent protection: a contribution to the current debateâ€. Research Policy no. 27:273-284.
Mazzoleni, Roberto, Nelson, Richard R. (1998b). “Economic Theories about the Benefits and Costs of Patentsâ€. Journal of Economic Issues no. 32 (4):1031-1052.
Mazzoleni, Roberto, Póvoa, Luciano Martins Costa (2010). “Accumulation of technological capabilities and economic development. Did Brazil'sIPR regime matter?†In Intellectual Property Rights, Development, and Catch-up. An International Comparative Study, edited by Hiroyuki Odagiri, Akira Goto, Atsushi Sunami and Richard R. Nelson, 280-314. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Moed, Henk F., Glanzel,Wolfgang, Schmoch, Ulrich (2004). Handbook of quantitative science and technology research: The use of publication and patent statistics in studies of S&T systems New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Niosi, Jorge (2012). Innovation and development through imitation (In praise of imitation). In International Schumpeter Society. Brisbane (Australia) Patel, Pari, Pavitt, Keith (1997). “The technological competences of the world’s largest firms: complex and path-dependent, but not much varietyâ€. Research Policy no. 26:141-156.
Penrose, Edith (1973). “International Patenting and the Less-Developed Countriesâ€. The Economic Journal no. 83 (331):768-786.
Rapini, Marcia Siqueira, Chiarini, Tulio, Bittencourt, Pablo Felipe (2016). “Obstacles to innovation in Brazil: The lack of qualified individuals to implement innovation and establish university–firm interactionsâ€. Industry and Higher Education no. Forthcoming.
Sell, Susan (2004). “Intellectual Property and Public Policy in Historical Perspective: Contestation and Settlementâ€. Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review no. 38:267-321.
Suzigan, Wilson, Furtado, João (2006). “PolÃtica industrial e desenvolvimentoâ€. Revista de Economia PolÃtica no. 26 (2):163-185.
Tigre, Paulo, Bastos, Caio, Machado, Victor, do Nascimento, França, Costa, LaÃs Silveira (2016). “Windows of opportunities and technological innovation in the Brazilian pharmaceutical industryâ€. Cadernos de Saúde Pública no. 32 (2):S1-S12.
Turchi, Lenita, Porto, Geciane (2013). “A PETROBRAS e ICTs: a construção das parceriasâ€. In Impactos Tecnológicos das Parcerias da PETROBRAS com Universidades, Centros de Pesquisa e Firmas Brasileiras, edited by Lenita Maria Turchi, Fernanda Negri and JOoão Alberto Negri, 43-80. BrasÃlia: Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (IPEA).
Vaitsos, Constantine (1972). “Patents revisited: Their function in developing countriesâ€. The Journal of Development Studies no. 9 (1):71-97.
Zheng, Jia, Zhao, Zhiyun, Zhang, Xu, Huang, Mu-hsuan, Chen, Dar-zen (2014). “Influences of counting methods on country rankings: a perspective from patent analysisâ€. Scientometrics no. 98 (3):2087-2102.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
 | Questa licenza permette a terzi di riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire, recitare e modificare quest'opera, purché vengano citati l'autore e la fonte. Questa è la più ampia tra le licenze Creative Commons, rispetto alle libertà concesse a terzi sulle opere licenziate sotto attribuzione. |
