Appunti per un progetto di ricerca sul rapporto fra adolescenti e informazione scientifica su internet
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.14600/irpps_wps.58.2013Parole chiave:
Alfabetizzazione Digitale, Nativo Digitale, Didattica della Scienza, Social NetworkAbstract
In questo working paper abbiamo raccolto alcuni appunti di lavoro per lo sviluppo di una ricerca interdisciplinare sull’interazione tra gli adolescenti italiani e l’informazione scientifica reperibile su internet. Malgrado internet risulti essere il principale strumento di informazione degli adolescenti, è molto meno chiaro quanto i giovani utenti del web siano in grado di selezionare e valutare l’informazione. Per analizzare il problema e studiare un possibile intervento con un approccio di ricerca-azione, è necessario unire competenze di sociologia della scienza e di didattica della scienza.Riferimenti bibliografici
Agorram, B., Caravita, S., Valente, A., Luzi, D. and Margnelli, N. (2009) “Knowledge and values in science textbooks concerning complexity in ecological systems and environmental problems. A cross-cultural study on Secondary School manualsâ€, US-China Education Review, 6 (2) 25-37.
Ala-Mutka, K., Punie, Y., Redecker, C. (2008) “Digital Competence for Lifelong Learningâ€, European Commission.
Albe, V., Simonneaux, L. (2005) “Epistemological Thought and role-playing: Impact on Pre-Service Teachers' Opinion on Mobile Phone Risks, Research and the Quality of Science Educationâ€, (Boersma, Goedhart, De Jong, Eijkelhogs eds.), Springer.
Avveduto, S. (2012) (edited by), “Scienza Connessaâ€, Roma: Gangemi.
Bell, R. L., Lederman, N. G., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2000) “Developing and acting upon one’s conception of the nature of science: A follow-up studyâ€, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37, 563-581.
Belmonte, C., Castellani, T. (2010) “Caffè scienza junior: gli studenti protagonisti della loro formazione scientificaâ€, in “Atti dell’VIII Convegno Nazionale sulla Comunicazione della Scienzaâ€.
Berthou-Gueydan, G., Clément, C. and Clément, P. (2008) “L’éducation à l’énvironnement dans les manuels scolaires de sciences de la vie et de la Terreâ€, Aster 46, 155-179.
Bodmer Report (1985) “The public understanding of scienceâ€, London: Royal Society.
Buck Gayle, A., Macintyre Latta, Margaret A., Leslie-Pelecky, Diandra L. (2007) “Learning How to Make Inquiry into Electricity and Magnetism. Discernible to Middle Level Teachersâ€, Journal of Science Teacher Education 18:377–397.
Calvani, A., Fini, A., Ranieri, M., Picci, P. (2012) “Are young generations in secondary school digitally competent? A study on Italian teenagersâ€, Computers & Education, vol. 58, issue 2.
Castellani T., Valente, A. (2012) “Science, democracy and participation†in proceedings “SciCafé 2012 Conference and Events: Europe’s Science Cafés Thinking Forwardâ€, Athens: Epinioa.
Caravita, S., Valente, A., Luzi, D., Pace, P., Khalil, I., Valanides, N., Nisiforou, O., Berthou, G., Kozan-Naumescu, A. and Clément, P. (2008) “Construction and Validation of Textbook Analysis Grids for Ecology and Environmental Educationâ€, Science Education International Journal, 19(2) 97-116.
Cerroni, A. (2006) “Scienza e società della conoscenzaâ€, Torino: UTET.
Clément, P. (2004) “Science et idéologie: exemples en didactique et épistémologie de la biologie. Actes du Colloque Sciences, médias et sociétéâ€, ENS-LSH.
Clément, P. (2006) “Didactic Transposition and KVP Model: Conceptions as Interactions Between Scientific knowledge, Values and Social Practicesâ€, Proceedings of the Summer School ESERA, IEC, Univ. Minho, Braga (Portugal), 9-18.
Clément, P. et Quessada, M. P. (2008) “Les convictions créationistes et/ou évolutionistes d’enseignants de biologie: une étude comparative dans dix-neuf paysâ€, Nature Sciences Sociétés 2008 16.
Cocking, R. R., Mestre, J. P., and Brown, A. L. (2000) “New developments in the science of learning: using research to help students learn Science and Mathematicsâ€, Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21 (1), 1-13.
Comoglio, M. (1996) “Verso una definizione del cooperative learningâ€, in “Animazione Socialeâ€, Torino: Gruppo Abele, n. 4.
Corringan, D., Dillon, J. & Gunstone, R. (2007) “The re-emergence of values in science educationâ€, Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Dahl, R. A. (1994) “A Democratic Dilemma: System Effectiveness versus Citizen Participationâ€, Political Science Quarterly, 109 (1).
De Haan, G., Huck, J., Eds (2008) “Recommendations for Policy makers, Form-it. Take part on research project, 6° European Framework Programmeâ€, Austrian Institute of Ecology.
Driver, R., Newton, P. & Osborne, J. (2000) “Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classroomâ€, Science Education, 84(3), 287-31.
Duschl, R. and Osborne, J. (2002) “Supporting and Promoting Argumentation Discourse in Science Educationâ€, Studies in Science Education, 38: 39â€72.
Eisenstein, E. L. (1983) “The printing revolution in early modern Europeâ€, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Erduran, S. & Jiménez-Aleixandre, M.P (Eds.) (2008) “Argumentation in Science Education, Perspectives from classroom-based researchâ€, Dordrecht: Springer.
European Commission, DG Science and Society (2004) “Europe Needs More Scientistsâ€, Report by the High Level Group on Increasing Human Resources for Science and Technology in Europe.
European Commission, DG Research (2007) “Science and governance: Taking European Knowledge Society Seriouslyâ€, Report of the expert group on science and governance to the science, economy and society directorate, EUR 22700, Brussels.
European Commission (2011) report code: COM(2011)500.
Falcinelli, F. (2012) “I giovani e i mediaâ€, Education Sciences & Society, 3(2).
Fillon, P. & Peterfalvi, B. (2004) “L’argumentation dans l’apprentissage scientifique au collègeâ€, Aster, 38, 151-184.
Funtowicz, S., Ravetz, J. (1999) “Post-Normal Science – an insight now maturingâ€, Ed Futures.
Given, H., Kuh L., Lee Keenan, D., Mardell, B., Redditt, S., Twombly, S. (2010) “Changing School Culture: Using Documentation to Support Collaborative Inquiryâ€, Theory Into Practice, 49:36–46.
Greenhow, C., Robelia B., Hughes, J. E. (2009) “Web 2.0 and Classroom Research: What Path Should We Take Now?â€, Educational Researcher vol. 38 no. 4.
Greenwood, A., & Scribner-MacLean, M. (1997, March) “Examining elementary teachers’ explanations of their science content knowledgeâ€, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Oak Brook, IL, March 24 1997.
Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. & Pressley, M. (2000) “Discorse patterns and collaborative scienific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussionâ€, Cognition and Instruction, 17, 379-432.
Hubat, A-M., Gaudillère, J.-P. (1992) “Argumenter et démontrer: rhétorique et enjeux sociaux dans les discours scientifiquesâ€, Aster, N. 14, 21- 40.
Irwin, A. (2001) “Constructing the scientific citizen: science and democracy inthe biosciencesâ€, Public Understanding of Science, 10, 1-18.
Jasanoff, S. (2003) “Technologies of humility: Citizens participation in governing scienceâ€, Minerva, 41 (3).
Jenkins, E. (1999) “School science, citizenship and the public understanding of scienceâ€, International Journal of Science Education, 21, 703-710.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., Erduran, S. (2008) “Argumentation in Science Educationâ€, Springer.
Knorr-Cetina, K. (1999) “Epistemic cultures: How sciences make knowledge†Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Kolstoe, S. D. (2001) “Scientific literacy for citizenship. Tool dealing ith the science dimension of controversial socio-scientific issuesâ€, Science Education, 85, 291-310.
Kuhn, D. (1993) “Science as argument: implications for teaching and leaning scientific thinkingâ€, Science Education, 77 (3), 319-337.
Latour, B. (1987) “Science in Actionâ€, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lengwiler, M. (2008) “Participatory Approaches in Science and Technology: Historical Origins and Current Practices in Critical Perspectiveâ€, Science, Technology and Human Values, 33.
Li, Y., Ranieri M. (2010) “Are ‘Digital Natives’ Really Digitally Competent? – A Study on Chinese Teenagersâ€, British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 41, issue 6.
Marble, S. (2007) “Inquiring into Teaching: Lesson Study in Elementary Science Methodsâ€, Journal of Science Teacher Education 18:935–953.
Mayer, M. Ed. (2008) “Catalogue of Good Practices examples, Form-it Take part on research projectâ€, 6° European Framework Programme, Austrian Institute of Ecology.
Midoro, V. (1994) “Per una definizione di apprendimento cooperativoâ€, Tecnologie Didattiche, n. 4, Ortona: Menabò.
Millar, R. & Osborne, J. (eds) (1998) “Beyond 2000: Science Education for the Future†London: King’s College London.
Murcia, ?? (2009) “Re-thinking the Development of Scientific Literacy Through a Rope Metaphorâ€, Research in Science Education (2009) 39:215–229.
Osborne, J., Simons, S. and Collins, S. (2003) Attitudes towards science: a review of the literature and its implications, International Journal of Science Education, 25, 1049-1079.
Osborne, J. (2005) “The role of Argument in Science Educationâ€, Research and the Quality of Science Education, (Boersma, Goedhart, De Jong, Eijkelhogs eds.), Springer.
Peters, Erin E. (2009) “Shifting to a Student-Centered Science Classroom: An Exploration of Teacher and Student Changes in Perceptions and Practicesâ€, Journal of Science Teacher Education vol.21 n.3.
Pugh, K. J., Girod, M. (2007) “Science, Art, and Experience: Constructing a Science Pedagogy From Dewey’s Aestheticsâ€, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18:9–27.
Ratcliffe, M. Grace, M. (2003) “Science education for citizenship: teaching socio-scientific issuesâ€, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
Rivoltella, P. C. (2003) “Costruttivismo e pragmatica della comunicazione on line. Socialità e didattica in Internetâ€, Trento: Erickson.
Rogers, C. R. (1978) “Potere personale, La forza interiore e il suo effetto rivoluzionarioâ€, Roma: Astrolabio Ubaldini.
Ryder, J. (2001) Identifying science understanding for functional scientific literacy, Studies in Science Education, 36, 1-44.
Simonneaux, L., Albe, V., Ducamp, C. & Simonneaux, J. (2005) “Do high-school students’ perceptions of science change when addressed directly by researchers?†Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science, and Technology Education, 1, (1), 21-40.
Solomon, J. (1992) “Getting to know about Energy in school and societyâ€, London, Taylor & Francis Group.
Valente, A., Cerbara, L., Caravita, S., Luzi, D. (2007) “Conceptions on evolution in teachers and future teachers: results of an italian investigationâ€, Proceedings XIII IOSTE Symposium, September 21-25, 2008, Kusadasi, Turkey.
Valente, A. (2009) (edited by), “Science: perception and participationâ€, Biblink, Roma.
Wee, B., Shepardson D., Fast J., Harbor J. (2007) “Teaching and Learning About Inquiry: Insights and Challenges in Professional Developmentâ€, Journal of Science Teacher Education 18:63–89.
Wolfendale Report (1995) committee to review the contribution of scientists and engineers to the public understanding of science, Engineering and Technology, London.
Zeidler, D. L. and Nichols, B.H. (2009) “Socioscientific issues: Theory and practiceâ€, Journal of Elementary Science Teacher Education, 21(2), 49-58.
Ziman, J. M. (1994) “Prometheus Boundâ€, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
##submission.downloads##
Pubblicato
Come citare
Fascicolo
Sezione
Licenza
 | Questa licenza permette a terzi di riprodurre, distribuire, comunicare al pubblico, esporre in pubblico, rappresentare, eseguire, recitare e modificare quest'opera, purché vengano citati l'autore e la fonte. Questa è la più ampia tra le licenze Creative Commons, rispetto alle libertà concesse a terzi sulle opere licenziate sotto attribuzione. |
